As a novelist, you’ll spend months or even years working on your manuscript. It’s only natural that you’d want to get feedback on it before you submit it for publication or self-publish it. Two popular options for receiving feedback are beta reading and manuscript evaluation (also known as an editorial assessment). While both of these methods involve getting feedback on your manuscript, they are quite different in what they offer and what you can expect. Let’s explore the differences between each so you can choose the right option for you.
What Is Beta Reading?
Beta reading is a process where you give your manuscript to a group of readers for feedback. Beta readers are typically other writers, avid readers, or people who are otherwise part of your target audience. They read your manuscript and provide feedback based on their personal opinions and experiences. They’ll tell you what they liked and what they didn’t like. This often involves identifying any plot holes, inconsistencies, or confusing passages. They will also typically tell you what they liked or didn’t like about the novel’s characters. Overall, they will offer suggestions for how you can improve the story.
Beta reading is often done for free, and it can be a great way to get feedback on your manuscript before submitting it to agents or publishers. Beta readers can give you an idea of how your book will be received by readers. However, keep in mind that the feedback you receive from them is subjective and may not always be in line with your vision for your manuscript.
What Is a Manuscript Evaluation?
A manuscript evaluation (or editorial assessment) is a professional service that involves hiring an editor to provide feedback on your manuscript. Manuscript evaluations are typically done by experienced editors who specialize in the genre of your story. They’ll read your manuscript and provide a detailed report that includes feedback on plot, character development, pacing, style, and more. They will also provide suggestions for how you can improve your manuscript and make it more marketable.
Unlike beta reading, manuscript evaluations are not free. They can be costly because of the time it takes to complete them. However, they offer a much more in-depth and professional level of feedback than beta reading. They are especially useful in identifying weaknesses in your manuscript before you submit it to a publisher or agent. They are also useful if you simply want to improve your craft and get feedback from a professional editor.
Another advantage of a manuscript evaluation is that you don’t need to complete your manuscript before you get one. In fact, getting an evaluation on a half-written manuscript can be a great way to determine whether you’re on the right track towards an engaging story. It can also help you in charting a path to complete it. Experienced editors have a keen eye for realizing the potential of a story and helping writers unearth it.
Is Beta Reading or a Manuscript Evaluation Right for You?
Here are some strategies for deciding between beta reading and a manuscript evaluation:
1. Determine Your Goals
Before deciding between the two, it’s important to determine your goals for seeking feedback on your manuscript. Are you looking for a quick and inexpensive way to get reader feedback? Or are you looking for a more in-depth and professional level of feedback to help you improve your craft? Knowing your goals will help you make an informed decision.
2. Consider Your Budget
Beta reading is typically done for free, while manuscript evaluations can be expensive. Consider your budget when deciding between the two options. If you’re on a tight budget, beta reading may be the way to go. If you can afford a professional service, a manuscript evaluation may be the better choice if you want to make sure you get the most out of your story.
3. Evaluate Your Manuscript
Take an honest look at your manuscript and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses. If you’re confident that your manuscript doesn’t have any major issues, getting feedback from beta readers may be sufficient. However, if you have a lot of uncertainty about major aspects of your manuscript, you may want a professional editor to evaluate it instead.
4. Consider Your Timeline
Beta reading can provide quick feedback, as you can get responses from multiple people within a short period. Manuscript evaluations, on the other hand, can take several weeks or even months to complete, depending on the manuscript’s word count and the editor’s availability. Consider your timeline when deciding. If you need feedback sooner rather than later, beta reading may be the better choice.
5. Determine Your Audience
Consider your target audience when deciding between beta reading and a manuscript evaluation. If your target audience is other writers or avid readers, beta reading is a good way to get feedback. If your target audience is agents or publishers, a manuscript evaluation may be more appropriate. This is because it can help you identify any weaknesses in your manuscript that may prevent it from being accepted.
Both beta reading and manuscript evaluations can be useful for getting feedback on your manuscript. The choice between the two really depends on your needs and goals. Whatever you choose, remember that feedback is an essential part of the writing process.
Recommended Reading
Note: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases of this book and more.